
Lino Brocka’s characters in the film Tinimbang Ka Nguni’t Kulang (1974) (You’ve been Weighed and found Wanting) , attempted to awaken the ‘common’ Fillipino to take notice of the Political Oppression of that era.

In one of Lino Brocka’s first major hits : Tinimbang Ka Nguni’t Kulang (1974) (You’ve been Weighed and found Wanting), Lino Brocka had finally come into his own. After forming his company Cinemanila after the Martial Law of 1972 , Brocka attempted to develop creative but socially relevant works to the Philippines and for his people (Yeatter, 2007, pg.137).
Tinimbang Ka Nguni’t Kulang (T.K.N.K) was the first film he made to do just that – to bring notice to the ever-rising tensions felt during the Marcos ‘Filipinization Movement’. What is interesting though is how Lino Brocka attempted to do this. The films content, powerful as it is, is nothing without interesting and involving characters. The fact that it was a box office hit and a prevailing notion that commerce and art did mix (Sotto, 2000, p.38) – it proved to be a telling sign that people were listening. So what of Lino Brocka’s characters and their part in the social commentary he attempted to speak of?
Perhaps firstly to get a better understanding – the exploration of Filipino society at that time is crucial. From 1965 to 1986 , Ferdinand Marcos came into power as the 10
th President of the Phillipines. Marcos had a vision for the Phillipines – one translating into ‘Bagong Lipunan’ or New Society. This new movement aimed to remove old colonial models and remake the Phillipines in more ways than one by bolstering national pride through self realization.(Wikipedia, 2008, para 3)
However this initial aim was marred by the Martial Law of 1972 by corruption both politically and through the violation of human rights. While Martial Law in itself plunged crime rates and issued some measure of control – it denied the Fillipino people of free speech, opinions and opposing views to his régime. Alienation soon developed between the masses and the government as Fillipino people with contrary views to this ‘New Society’ were imprisoned , tortured, executed and silenced through the control of the press and media. What became more telling was the ever rising revelation that the Marcos Régime had millions invested in the United States and that perhaps Martial Law was a way of controlling the spread of Communism as to appear ‘in the good light’ of the Americas.
This created a new society in the form of filmmakers in the Phillipines – martial law was not just affecting the industry but the social realization that something was indeed terribly wrong with the Marcos Régime and his ‘better tomorrow’. In Lino Brocka’s case it demanded attention ; if Marcos would not listen to the people than the people would have to listen cinematically . In Being and Becoming: The Cinema’s of Asia, Luis H Francia says it best when he says : “…when limitations are put on the spirit, when an official atmosphere seeks to stifle free and creative expression, then the director , or any artiste ‚who bucks at the reigns of approved thought, commits as Lino Brocka put it to , ‘acts of civil disobedience’ (Francia H.L, 2002 , p. 354). This created the ‘uneasy alliance’ between the government and the film industry, that nevertheless drove filmmakers like Brocka to make statements about the oppression in his films (Server , 1999, p.103).

So how do these themes relate to the film and what Lino Brocka tried to do with these elements? T.K.N.K at its heart is a tragedy – a tale of misplaced love and corrupted individuals who tarnish the human heart. It centers on a love affair between a disturbed homeless woman Kuala and a leper called Berto living on the brim of society (Yeatter, 2007, pg.137). They are both befriended by the young Junior who at first seem adverse to them but gradually seems to develop a bond for the purity of their relationship. His attempts to grant them social acceptance is further marred by the townsfolk and his own rich parents.
In T.K.N.K there are , when broken down, two specific sides : The Alienated and The Oppressors. While at that time the Phillipino society could not be categorized as such , each side in Tinimbang Ka Nguni’t Kulang tried to tell us different things. There are the people and the Oppressors – the common man and the Government.
The Alienated , perhaps represented by the young boyish insecurities of the main lead Junior ( played by Christopher De Leon) is a character many Philippines can relate to. This is due to many scenes depicted Junior’s way of life, his social status and the way he is perceived by his friends and family. The general Phillipino film-going audience can identify with being burdened by a “…religion that reveres suffering” and feudal values that “…twart their aspirations” (Francia H.L , 2002, p. 356).
While Junior is lives comfortably, it is his story we journey with and it is he in which the film truly speaks. On the forefront – the Phillipino people would indeed relate their own status to him – however– an underlying current of dissatisfaction and confusion impairs his life. While his parents bicker everyday and his friends seek the latest childish endeavor, Junior is at heart a lost boy. It is his journey through the film that we see ‘oppression’ and the dark side of the human heart. In essence, Lino Brocka indeed tried to relate Junior to the common Fillipino while showing us Oppression that can be related to the ‘unfeeling’ nature of that era.

One cannot deny similarities between an Oppressive Government and the strange , almost military-que uniforms of the ‘Christian Association’ depicted in the film. The towns local association, a group of ladies supposedly dedicated to the renewal of the town , seem villains of sort. Their lack of interest in the alienated crazy slum woman Kuala (played by Lolita Rodriguez) while pregnant , seems to raise more questions. If they are acting in the eyes of God – why is a man suffering of Leprosy the only man that truly loves her?
Another interesting observation is the role of the ‘Oppressor’ or power hungry individual. Who plays this role in the film? Junior is the son of two wealthy parents – that being Lilia Dizon and Eddie Garcia’s character Cesar. Cesar is nothing else that what he is portrayed as – a rouge, womanizer and a man obsessed with testosterone fueled endeavors which seem to assert his own lack of parenting skills. Indeed at the beginning of the film were introduced to Cesar and the then unknown Kuala. Cesar , is seen forcing Kuala into a abortion by almost evil means – reduced to a horrifying display of human intent. Later we realize that the reason Kuala has become unstable is because of that very act – corrupted in the most fundamental way possible : forced human abortion.
Cesar seems in all manner of speaking a translation of Ferdinand Marcos himself – a villain living amongst the people and causing suffering and unhappiness wherever he seems to be. Cesar’s marriage is in chaos as well and yet he lives in a golden laden mansion — obsessed with impressing others in monetary terms. He at times is also seen as the ‘ring leader’ of the local society – a society that mocks, insults and at times humiliates the ‘alienated’ like Berto and Kuala. There is a very interesting scene where Berto, wandering the city after a pregnant Kuala is taken by the local Christian Association . He seems to find, for a moment, peace in the town. Then from the corner of his eye a group of locals offer him a free meal. Little does he know that it is his own pet dog – another love corrupted by man.

Some people may argue that all of these meanings are too deep – too imbedded in the tale to mean much. I am not saying Lino Brocka downright adapted these characters from a political context – but rather from honest observation. Lino Brocka, during his time as a Mormon Missionary , sought to this technique when analyzing the human condition of a group of Lepers. He found their bravery and optimistic lifestyle refreshing and enlightening and eventually , in my opinion , took this unique tool to his cinematic endeavors. His films are social commentaries , more often than not , deeply rooted in the plights and struggles of people and friends Lino Brocka observed during his time alive. The characters are true reflections of a greater social identity – in this case the atrocities of the ‘New Society’.
All these questions seem to lead to the evitable challenge that speaks about Brocka’s stance against the Marcos régime : “When the victims refuse their roles , what becomes of the oppressors?” (Francia H.L, 2002, p.357). He challenged the local man to ponder this question in hopes that, they would act before it is too late. Just like the ending of T.N.K we are left contemplating as we see innocence shattered. Berto , after finding his love , is shot dead trying to protect her from a dirty mob. Junior is seen carrying the new born child – Berto dead and seemingly Kuala as well from childbirth. He walks slowly into the gathering mob – a haunting melody accompanying his walk to Berto’s body where he lays the baby down.
Corruption of man? Perhaps. A corruption of politics. Maybe. Or perhaps what Lino Brocka merely intended to do , was to show the Phillipino people of that era that the human spirit cannot be denied , even when the Oppressors hold all the power , all the guns and all the bullets.
Written by Kane Wheatley-Holder
References:
Francia H, Luis., (2002). “Being and Becoming: The Cinema of Asia” , New Delhi: MacMillan India Limited.
Sever, Lee , (1999). “Asian Pop Cinema : Bombay to Tokyo” , San Francisco : Chronical Books.
Sotto, Agustin , (2000). “Film in South East Asia: Views from the Region”, SEAPAVAA and VIETNAM FILM INSITITUTE .
Wikipedia – Ferdinand Marcos. (21 July 2008). Wikimedia Foundation Inc . Retrieved 18 July , 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Marcos.
Yeatter L. Bryan , (2007). “Cinema of the Phillipines”, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.