How many out there know who the Muppets were?
Okay, 3 of you. So when it was first reported that Jason Segel (How I Met Your Mother and Forgetting Sarah Marshall) would be taking on one of the most beloved movie/TV properties of all time, The Muppets, needless to say, reactions were somewhat mixed.
I grew up watching the muppets (which is to say that I am still young by the world standard. I was not sure whether he will milk it for his popularity of just a springboard for “I am Forgetting Sarah Marshall” — a sequel of his previous film which is not even in the cards.
Then as parody trailer after creative parody trailer debuted online and in theaters, more and more moviegoers became cautiously optimistic that The Muppets would actually turn out to be not just an enjoyable trip to the theater but a worthy installment in a series that hasn’t seen a big screen release in over twelve years (the last one being Muppets from Space).
Fortunately, The Muppets not only delivers an enjoyable trip to the movies, the film also addresses a number of reasons why the titular characters deserve to be a staple in the current cinescape – directly tackling the cynicism of our modern entertainment offerings. That said, the film isn’t overly preachy, and despite a number of celebrity cameos, lets the familiar felt-covered faces of characters like Kermit the Frog, Miss Piggy, Gonzo, and Fozzie Bear take center stage.
Unlike a lot of modern films which have to work hard to keep their audiences entertained with explosions, eye-popping CGI, and “gritty” interpretations, Henson’s creations are still able to keep audiences invested due largely to their heartfelt/charming personalities. Even Walter, despite being the new Muppet on the block, holds his own alongside his fellow non-human friends, and will no doubt be a fan-favorite for years to come.
While the overarching storyline in The Muppets isn’t the most imaginative narrative in the series, the combination of social satire and genuinely endearing character moments succeeds in delivering one of the most sincere installments of the franchise. As mentioned, Segel sidestepped the limelight and puts Walter center stage. Walter is the world’s biggest Muppet fan – and destiny calls when he travels with his biological, yet human, brother Gary (Segel) and Gary’s girlfriend, Mary (Amy Adams), to Hollywood. Walter becomes the only person capable of reuniting the Muppets, who have all gone their separate ways, so that they can stop a rich oil tycoon, Tex Richman (Chris Cooper), from tearing down the iconic Muppet Theater.
This film was fortunately helm by people who wanted to see the Muppets back on screen rather than prostituting themselves over an 80’s icon (Patrick Harris –Smurfs and Jason Lee –Alvin and the Chipmunks — are YOU LISTENING?)
Without giving much away, this film attempts to make a film OLD school, no CGI effects, no 3D gimmicks, just good old fashion pure cinematic experience. With a good storyline, good moral values, and funny and heartwarming songs, this film will go a long way. It teaches something missing in teenagers now a days– SELF BELIEF.
This is the perfect family movie for Christmas or any occasion as when you watch it together, it binds you. And if a teenager walks out of the movie to say –BORING. Then I feel sorry for this generation.
With 97% approval rate with ROTTEN TOMATOES, the critics got this one right-BIG TIME. But you know what? I am certain it will not be a big BOX OFFICE hit in terms of money because a certain 26% crappy film about Vampire sex and babies are polluting the world now.
Apple’s iProducts. South Korean pop music. Air.
These things are everywhere. You can’t avoid them without making a conscious effort.
In a word, ubiquitous.
That word is bandied around a lot in the documentary Helvetica. The film is directed and produced by Gary Hustwit, and was released in 2007 to coincide with the fiftieth birthday of the font typeface family.
With the subject of Helvetica seeming to be anything but complex, one would expect the rest of the film to follow suit by being similarly transparent; indeed, Helvetica is made up of footage of ranting old men, among other things. This, however, is where the film truly shines.
Read More >“Puss in Boots” mixes it all up, how it mixes is refreshing. Even more than in the “Shrek” movies, from which this likely candidate for a new animated franchise is spun off, it is a cheerfully chaotic jumble of fairy tale and nursery rhyme characters parachuted into a Spanish storybook setting. It also looks terrific: brighter, with a lot more visual pizzazz than the “Shrek” films. Even when the story loses its thread, the movie rewards your eye.
Read More >This a movie that feels like Ocean’s 11 but is not quite up to the stylized version of the film.
Here, Alan Alda (MASH) is at his creepily dislikable best as a rich Wall Street figure whose lowliest employees seek revenge after he has swindled them out of their pensions and life savings. He is of course Bernie Maddoff who took away millions from investors.
The movie takes half an hour to get going, showing us the workings of the rich in a rich town in a rich building. So when Alan Alda gets arrested and is found to have swindled money from the workers in the building, Stiller decides on a heist of the fraudster’s hidden cash which coincides with Macy’s Thanksgiving Day parade in New York. It should have been fun but its rather less fun than it might have been due to some poor timing.
Read More >Book in: A term used by Singaporean Men who are in the National Service, and means for the personnel to report back to their respective camp.
2359 was released in Singapore on the 3rd November 2011.
It’s a local movie set in 1983 Pulau Tekong (the place where most Singapore Men would start their National Service in), about an island haunted by the spirit of a Bomo (a spiritual medium) mother and child, and a soldier with a third eye.With such a plot, you could probably get a Hollywood movie, but that wouldn’t be a place that’s anywhere close to home, and it wouldn’t be a place Singaporean guys have gone to or would have to go to, unlike Pulau Tekong.
Read More >In a recent event, Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson chose Empire magazine to reveal the first look at The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn. Headed our way next October, the film adapts the enormously popular books by Hergé in performance-captured, 3D form. They quoted:
“With live action you’re going to have actors pretending to be Captain Haddock and Tintin,” says Peter Jackson. “You’d be casting people to look like them. It’s not really going to feel like the Tintin Hergé drew. It’s going to be somewhat different. With CGI we can bring Hergé’s world to life, keep the stylised caricatured faces, keep everything looking like Hergé’s artwork, but make it photo-real.”
So my question is “WHY BOTHER?” Why can’t they just make a fantastic kick ass animation that look like the original with sweeping cameras and realistic animation movements?
Read More >I’ll like to start by saying, bravo to Real Steel; the impact this film had on me was stronger than steel.
Many of us would remember Hugh Jackman as Wolverine from the X-Men films, with his bushy hair, long sideburns and badass claws, it wouldn’t be hard to imagine him in another film which involves fighting and metal, albeit the clean shaven look with short hair.
Real Steel is set in the future, where human boxing becomes obsolete and robots are fighting in the ring instead. Hugh Jackman, who was once a boxer in the ring, ends up using robots to compete and runs into many obstacles. At the same time, he took care of his 11 year old son, who forms an unlikely relationship and braces through the hardships together.
Read More >